As a lawyer, communication and advocacy are at the heart of what I do. My blog is another tool in my arsenal to reach, educate, and connect with a broader audience. Here’s why I love contributing through my blog:
Unlike the conversational nature of my podcast, my blog allows for in-depth analysis of legal issues. I can delve into the intricacies of a case, explore legal precedents, and provide comprehensive insights that are often more suited to the written word. This format is ideal for readers who want to study the details at their own pace.
A blog serves as a lasting written record of my thoughts, opinions, and analyses. It’s a valuable resource that readers can refer back to at any time. This permanence is particularly useful for complex topics that benefit from thorough explanation and documentation.
Over time, my blog has become a rich resource library on various legal topics. Readers can easily search and find information on specific issues, making it a practical tool for both legal professionals and the general public. This accessibility supports my mission to demystify the law and provide useful information to those who need it.
Writing a blog helps establish my thought leadership in the legal field. It’s a platform where I can share my unique perspective, comment on current events, and provide expert analysis. This not only enhances my professional credibility but also contributes to the broader legal discourse.
My blog also serves as a space for personal reflection on my experiences in the legal profession. I can share stories, discuss challenges, and reflect on my journey in a way that fosters a deeper connection with my readers. This narrative aspect adds a personal touch that complements the more formal content.
A technological awakening is on the horizon in the sun-soaked paradise of Aruba, where azure waters meet sugar-white sands. Despite lagging in the fast-paced realm of technology and making meager…
Recently, I’ve found myself immersed in a flurry of enriching activities that have left little room for idle moments. Despite the bustling schedule, my commitment to delivering insightful weekly LEGAL…
Often, I am approached by folks with legal questions, whether at the grocery store, in a parking lot, or at a restaurant. It usually starts with: “I know this is…
Introduction Public trust in institutions is foundational to a functioning democracy. When these institutions, especially those like the Chamber of Commerce (Chamber), fail to uphold transparency and legal standards, it…
Public institutions play a vital role in society, ensuring law enforcement and citizen rights protection. However, when they deviate from legal frameworks, public trust is compromised. The case of Chamber of Commerce (KvK) charging unjust fees exemplifies this. The KvK must restore compliance, refund unjust fees, and take long-term measures to prevent future issues, ensuring legal integrity and public trust.
According to article 19 of the Handelsregisterbesluit AB 1989 no. GT 87 and its subsequent amendments) (“Decree”), the specific fees mentioned pertain to the issuance of certified copies, extracts, and…
As Aruba navigates the complexities of the global financial landscape, recent developments have brought to light both the strengths and vulnerabilities within our fiscal management. In October of last year…
Last Friday was World Telecom Day, and the state-owned and controlled telecommunications company, SETAR, spent good money in the media showcasing its bundles and vision for the future. However, that…
The debate over codifying same-sex marriage in Aruba and Curaçao has reached a standstill in the parliament, with the fate of these marriages now in the hands of the Supreme Court. The Association of Christian Churches, opposing same-sex marriage, has been called out for trying to influence the court despite lacking legal standing. Furthermore, there are calls to reconsider the tax-exempt status of these churches to ensure fair representation and contribution to society.
The author reflects on government actions in Aruba, highlighting concerns about hotel industry growth, a new hotel policy, and a significant pay raise for civil servants. They question the legal basis, examine implications, and criticize the decisions as good politics but poor governance. The public unions’ actions are also scrutinized, with a warning about more such actions prior to elections.
